Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Is America Still Making Men?

This was posted on the Facebook wall of my good friend Glory T. I thought it very poignant and want to share it with all of you.

Is America Still Making Men?
by Dennis Prager

Every society has to answer a few basic questions in order to succeed and even in order to survive. One of them is, "How do we make good men?"

The reason for the importance of this question is simple: Males untutored about how to control their natures will likely do much harm. Conversely, males who are taught to how to control themselves and to channel their drives in positive directions make the world a much better place. The good man is a glory of civilization; the bad man ruins it.

Throughout American history, American society asked, "How do we make men?" (It was understood that "man" meant a good man.) Anyone who thought about the subject knew that boys who are not transformed into men remain boys. And when too many boys do not grow up into men, women suffer and society suffers.

What is a man (as opposed to a boy)? The traditional understanding was that a man is he who takes responsibility for others -- for his family, his community and his country -- and, of course, for himself. A man stood for ideals and values higher than himself. He conducted himself with dignity. And he was strong.

For much of American history, making boys into men was understood to be of supreme importance, and society was usually successful. When I was a boy in the 1950s, without anyone expressly defining it, I knew what a man was supposed to be. And I knew that society, not to mention my parents, expected me to be one. It went without explicitly saying so that I would have to make a living, support myself as soon as possible and support a family thereafter.

When I acted immaturely, I was told to be or act like a man. I wonder how many boys are told to "be a man" today; and if they were, would they have a clue as to what that meant? It would appear that for millions of American boys, this has not been the reality for decades. Many families and society as a whole seem to have forgotten boys need to be made into men.
There are numerous reasons:

The distinction between men and boys has been largely obliterated. The older males that many American boys encounter are essentially older boys, not men. They speak, dress, and act similarly (think of men who "high-five" young boys instead of shaking their hands). And they are almost all called by their first names. Even when a boy (or girl) addresses an adult male as "Mr.," many men will correct the young boy or girl -- "Call me" and then give the young person his first name. This is often true even with regard to teachers, physicians and members of the clergy. When a young person calls an adult by his first name, the status of the two individuals has been essentially equated. Boys need men to respect. It's not impossible to do so when they call men by their first names, but it makes it much harder.

Boys today have fewer adult men in their lives than ever before. Many boys are not raised by any father. More are not raised by a father who lives in the home full time. Nearly every teacher and principal American boys have in elementary and high school is a female. The boy's clergy person and physician may well be women. And few male figures in contemporary film radiate manhood as defined above.

The ideals of masculinity and femininity have been largely rendered extinct. Feminism, arguably the most influential American movement of the 20th century, declared war on the concepts of femininity and masculinity. And for much of the population, it was victorious. Indeed, thanks to the feminist teaching that male and female human beings are essentially the same (note, incidentally, that no one argues that male and female animals are the same, only human beings are), untold numbers of boys have been raised as if they were like girls. They were denied masculine toys such as play guns and toy soldiers, and their male forms of play -- e.g., roughhousing -- were banned.

America has become a rights-centered rather than a responsibility-centered society. Aside from helping to produce a pandemic of narcissism, the rights-centered mindset is the opposite of the obligation/responsibility-centered mindset that makes a boy into a man. It is not good for either sex to be rights-preoccupied; but it is particularly devastating to developing men, as men are supposed to be obligation-directed. The baby boomer generation helped destroy manhood in most of the ways described here. One additional example was its widespread slogan, "Make love, not war." One cannot come up with a more unmanly piece of advice: "Don't fight for your country, screw girls." If the greatest generation had adopted that motto, Hitler and Tojo would have won. A few years ago, the city of Chicago named a street after Hugh Hefner, a man who has played games much of the day and night, lived in pajamas and devoted his life to sex -- quite a model of manhood for American boys.

There are few places where men can bond with other men. One major way men become men is by associating with other good men. The only places left where this normally takes place are sports teams and the military. The same holds true for boys. And much of society is now working on breaking the most significant all-boys institution, the Boy Scouts.

Males no longer have distinctive roles. Men do best when they are relied upon, when needed; and they feel most needed when they do something distinct from women. This exists today in sports and the military. It is symbolic -- significantly so -- that there are no more "men at work" signs on highways. Now "people" are at work. "Men" have disappeared.

Many churches and synagogues have been feminized. This has occurred in at least three important ways: Clergy are increasingly female (and touchy-feely males) -- for the first time in Christian and Jewish history; God is often depicted as androgynous and no longer either demanding or judging (He just loves all the time); and religion has been changed from morally and theologically demanding to a therapeutic model. So religion, too, has become yet another place where boys encounter few men, and few masculine models (even in God, as noted, is no longer masculine).

Instead of the traditional American model of masculinity, which was a rare combination of masculine toughness and stoicism with doing good (e.g., Superman), boys are now taught to be preoccupied with their feelings and with (unearned) self-esteem. They are not even allowed to lose; all boys playing a sport are given trophies, not just winners.

Increasingly, marriage is regarded as optional. The most obvious expression of men assuming responsibility -- marrying a woman and taking care of her and their children -- is no longer a male ideal. Vast numbers of men quite openly admit to having problems with the C-word (commitment) and responsibility of being a family's sole breadwinner.

When boys do not become men, women assume their roles. But they are not happy doing so. There are any number of reasons American women suffer from depression more than ever before and more than men. It is difficult to believe that one of those reasons is not the very emasculation of men that the movement working in their name helped to bring about. And so, a vicious cycle has commenced -- men stop being men; women become man-like; men retreat even further from their manly role; and women get sadder.

Monday, February 15, 2010

Joke of the Week

The Philosophy of Ambiguity

For Those Who Love The Philosophy of Ambiguity,
as well as The Idiosyncrasies of English:

1. DON'T SWEAT THE PETTY THINGS AND DON'T PET THE SWEATY THINGS.

2. ONE TEQUILA, TWO TEQUILA, THREE TEQUILA, FLOOR.

3. ATHEISM IS A NON-PROPHET ORGANIZATION.

4. IF MAN EVOLVED FROM MONKEYS AND APES, WHY DO WE STILL HAVE MONKEYS AND APES?

5. THE MAIN REASON THAT SANTA IS SO JOLLY IS BECAUSE HE KNOWS WHERE ALL THE BAD GIRLS LIVE.

6. I WENT TO A BOOKSTORE AND ASKED THE SALESWOMAN, "WHERE'S THE SELF- HELP SECTION?" SHE SAID IF SHE TOLD ME, IT WOULD DEFEAT THE PURPOSE.

7. WHAT IF THERE WERE NO HYPOTHETICAL QUESTIONS?

8. IF A DEAF CHILD SIGNS SWEAR WORDS, DOES HIS MOTHER WASH HIS HANDS WITH SOAP?

9. IF SOMEONE WITH MULTIPLE PERSONALITIES THREATENS TO KILL HIMSELF, IS IT CONSIDERED A HOSTAGE SITUATION?

10. IS THERE ANOTHER WORD FOR SYNONYM?

11. WHERE DO FOREST RANGERS GO TO "GET AWAY FROM IT ALL?"

12. WHAT DO YOU DO WHEN YOU SEE AN ENDANGERED ANIMAL EATING AN ENDANGERED PLANT?

13. IF A PARSLEY FARMER IS SUED, CAN HIS WAGES BE GARNISHED?

14. WOULD A FLY WITHOUT WINGS BE CALLED A WALK?

15. WHY DO THEY LOCK GAS STATION BATHROOMS? ARE THEY AFRAID SOMEONE WILL CLEAN THEM?

16. IF A TURTLE DOESN'T HAVE A SHELL, IS HE HOMELESS OR NAKED?

17. CAN VEGETARIANS EAT ANIMAL CRACKERS?

18. IF THE POLICE ARREST A MIME, DO THEY TELL HIM HE HAS THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT?

19. WHY DO THEY PUT BRAILLE ON THE DRIVE-THROUGH BANK MACHINES?

20. HOW DO THEY GET DEER TO CROSS THE ROAD ONLY AT THOSE YELLOW ROAD SIGNS?

21. WHAT WAS THE BEST THING BEFORE SLICED BREAD?

22. ONE NICE THING ABOUT EGOTISTS: THEY DON'T TALK ABOUT OTHER PEOPLE.

23. DOES THE LITTLE MERMAID WEAR AN ALGEBRA?

24. DO INFANTS ENJOY INFANCY AS MUCH AS ADULTS ENJOY ADULTERY?

25. HOW IS IT POSSIBLE TO HAVE A CIVIL WAR?

26. IF ONE SYNCHRONIZED SWIMMER DROWNS, DO THE REST DROWN TOO?

27. IF YOU ATE BOTH PASTA AND ANTIPASTO, WOULD YOU STILL BE HUNGRY?

28. IF YOU TRY TO FAIL, AND SUCCEED, WHICH HAVE YOU DONE?

29. WHOSE CRUEL IDEA WAS IT FOR THE WORD 'LISP' TO HAVE 'S' IN IT?

30. WHY ARE HEMORRHOIDS CALLED "HEMORRHOIDS" INSTEAD OF "ASSTEROIDS"?

31. WHY IS IT CALLED TOURIST SEASON IF WE CAN'T SHOOT AT THEM?

32. WHY IS THERE AN EXPIRATION DATE ON SOUR CREAM?

33. IF YOU SPIN AN ORIENTAL PERSON IN A CIRCLE THREE TIMES, DOES HE BECOME DISORIENTED?

34. CAN AN ATHEIST GET INSURANCE AGAINST ACTS OF GOD?

Tuesday, February 9, 2010

Pro-Choice? Choice My Aching Ass!


Super-Bowl has come and gone, and with it the Tebow Pro-Life commercial. First, let us address the idiocies of the leftists. They made a huge fuss over this ad. If they had just kept their stupid mouths shut, this ad would not have gotten anywhere near the publicity that it did. The only thing the Pro-Murder InfanticideChoice crowd could have done to to make this ad more widely known would have been to announce that, because of Tim Tebow's story, Planned Parenthood will no longer perform abortions because they have decided it is murder.

"I am blown away at the celebration of the violence against women in it," she told the Los Angeles Times. "That's what comes across to me even more strongly than the anti-abortion message. I myself am a survivor of domestic violence, and I don't find it charming. I think CBS should be ashamed of itself." - Terry O'Neill (NOW President)

This ad is the embodiment of choice. Mrs. Tebow risked her own life to do what was right for her. Review the ad, that is why I included it, she never says abortion is immoral, wrong., or in any way advocates anything. She merely puts the family's story out there where the people can take from it what they will. The fact that the Pro-"Choice" crowd even squawked at all is proof of their hypocrisy. They want to crush all dissenting opinions/stories. The mere fact that someone dares speak out against their agenda of infanticide shows them to be anti-choice and true leftists. Silly Christian, sit down, shut up and stop rocking the boat or we will throw you over the side.

"Hey Mom! Tried to kill you from the womb and failed. How about a blind side tackle? Violence against Moms." - Amanda Marcotte (Abortion Advocate) on Twitter

So in they come with their attacks. They say she is a liar, as abortion was not legal, and therefore not an option, in that time and place. Again they show their idiocy. In the Philippines abortion was indeed legal if it was medically necessary to save the life of the mother, which the doctors felt it was in this case. Then they said that the ad promoted violence towards women because Tim tackled his mother. This from the same crowd that says that all sex is coerced at best, and is in fact rape. Thanks NOW, your very existence drags the women's rights movement back fifty years. Yet not a peep was heard about this Snickers ad, where not only is an elderly woman tackled, but also portrays women as poor at sports. They support women like The Chosen One brings hope.

"Seriously, if you didn't know the context -- and context is everything in the case -- you would wonder what all the fuss was about. I was surprised by how lightly it touched on the difficult-pregnancy story (although there is the "miracle baby" reference)." - Tom Krattenmaker (Author of Onward, Christian Athletes)

I should not expect anything else from this group. After all Margaret Sanger, the face of the birth-control movement, and founder of Planned Parenthood, was a monster. Margaret Sanger was a eugenicist who advocated for disabled, poverty stricken, racial minorities and others she deemed to be genetically unfit to be banned from reproducing. The only thing I can not understand about the Pro-"Choice" movement, is why they are such advocates of abortion when their founder was initially against abortion, but later flip-flopped. Can they not see the hypocrisy? Sanger said, "[T]hat abortion was the wrong way—no matter how early it was performed it was taking life[.]" She also wrote in Woman and the New Race "I assert that the hundreds of thousands of abortions performed in America each year are a disgrace to civilization." Later her change of heart about the utility of abortion led her to go on record as saying, "The "Abortion Movement" will do very well to rid the country of the blacks." So why did she change her views? First it is murder but later it is apparently acceptable as long as it is applied to the "genetically unfit" and minorities. Again we see that in the leftist, Pro-Murder mind, morality is only an expediant, a new purer race is desirable, and that the minorities they pine away for when the cameras are rolling, are to be gotten rid of. There used to be a label for people like this, it was NAZI. Hitler has similar ideas about dealing with the "genetically unfit."

"The undeniably feeble-minded should, indeed, not only be discouraged but prevented from propagating their kind." - Margaret Sanger

Allow me to educate you, brothers and sisters, on a common tactic in open debate. When you do not have logical, well reasoned arguments to present, the poor debater falls back to personal attacks. I have yet to see one well thought out, logical objection to the Tebow ad. Instead we are presented with a united front of attacks on the Tebow family, Tim as a two time attempted matricide, promoting violence against women and specious, slanderous lies about Mrs. Tebow. No thought is given to an open and free exchange of opinions. No united sisterhood to support a woman who had to make the toughest CHOICE anyone could face. Attack! Attack! Attack! Who cares if we have not a leg to stand upon. To hell with morality, it is an outmoded concept anyway, and has no place in the "Glorious Future" butchers of children envision for our great nation. Opposition MUST be silenced! Dissent MUST be crushed, ruthlessly! Push the agenda at all costs! Let me tell you brothers and sisters, when the weak have no other options, they do not retire from the field to fight another day and another way. No, the weak attack, regardless of the foolishness of doing so. Personally I think they are just peeved that they did not think of this angle first.

Monday, February 8, 2010

Joke of the Week 2.0

I have been having a lot of problems both at home and at work. Things just have not been going my way. So last night I was depressed, so I called Lifeline. I got a freakin' call center in Pakistan. "Oh well," I thought. So I told them I was suicidal. They got all excited and asked if I could drive a truck.

Assholes..................

Joke of the Week

Tip O' the Hat to Doug H. for both of this week's jokes. I hope all you terrorists vegetarians enjoy this one. Happy Monday. Be sure to check out my new nuke cloud in the link below.

Monday, February 1, 2010

Joke of the Week

Here is a great joke that was emailed to me for you to start the week with.

Finally, a definition of globalization that I can understand and to which I now can relate:

Question:
What is the truest definition of Globalization?

Answer:
Princess Diana's death.

Question:
How come?

Answer :
An English princess with an Egyptian boyfriend crashes in a French tunnel, driving a German car with a Dutch engine, driven by a Belgian who was drunk on Scottish whisky, (check the bottle before you change the spelling), followed closely by Italian Paparazzi, on Japanese motorcycles and treated by an American doctor using Brazilian medicines.

This is sent to you by a Canadian, using American, Bill Gates's technology, and you're reading this on your computerthat uses Taiwanese chips, on a Korean monitor, assembled by Bangladeshi workers in a Singapore plant, transported by Indian truck drivers, hijacked by Indonesians, unloaded by Sicilian longshoremen, and trucked to you by Mexican illegal's....

That, my friends, is Globalization!

AWWWWW....too soon?

A Small Change

Greetings All,
Due to the high number of B.S. comments posted to RWE, I have instituted comment moderation. I will still maintain my other commenting policies, including posting dissenting opinions. Sorry for any inconvenience this might cause you.